Global: One Big Beautiful Bill impact on non-US persons with US investments or activities
Global: One Big Beautiful Bill impact on non-US persons with US investments or activities
09 juin 2025
Global
Global
Global
The US One Big Beautiful Bill could have a material impact on many non-US persons with investments or activities in the US, including withholding taxes on dividends, interest payments and royalties from US to non-US persons as well as transfers of US branch profits to non-US firms. These withholding taxes may not fall within exemptions in tax treaties.
Key takeaways
Non-US persons with investments or activities in the US could be subject to a US tax increase of 5% on gross income generated from such investments or activities beginning 2026 and increasing by 5% annually up to a maximum 50% rate
Non-US persons with operating subsidiaries in the US may be subject to increased Base Erosion Anti-avoidance Tax (BEAT) tax liability in the US
What is the proposed reform?
An increase in the rate of US federal income tax on income generated on US investments by residents of a “discriminatory foreign country”
A “discriminatory foreign country” is a country that imposes one or more “unfair foreign taxes”
“Unfair foreign taxes” is defined widely and as a consequence it is expected that a large number of countries will be a “discriminatory foreign country”, including the UK, all of the EU countries, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Turkey, South Korea, Japan, India, and others
The reform proposes a scaled increase in current US tax on income from US investments, starting with a 5% increase in year one potentially scaling to a maximum aggregate tax rate of 50% on relevant US income, and as proposed the additional tax charge would apply on top of any current reduced rates that apply under income tax treaties
Income within scope includes:
dividend payments from the US
interest payments from the US
royalty payments from the US
US branch profits
US subsidiaries of companies that are organized in a discriminatory foreign country also may be subject to additional tax liability under the US “BEAT” tax rules
Who will it impact?
The reform will have a wide impact, including:
non-US corporate groups with US subsidiaries or branches
non-US individuals with shares in US companies
non-US partnership structures with US investments
non-US lenders lending to US borrowers
foreign government entities such as sovereign wealth investors (it also looks likely that the new rules will disapply the US sovereign wealth exemption)
The rules are likely to look through multi-tier ownership structures to the ultimate beneficial owners
The tax increases will not apply to non-US corporate entities that are majority ultimately owned by US persons
When will it be introduced?
The tax measure (known as section 899) forms part of the package of tax reforms passed by the House of Representatives in the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB)
The legislation is now in the Senate where the wider bill is expected to be subject to significant modifications
It is not yet known what impact the Senate process will have on the s.899 provisions outlined above
If the s.899 provisions are passed in broadly their current form, the increased tax charge will apply from the tax year following the latest of:
90 days after s.899 is enacted into law;
180 days after a foreign country adopts a unfair foreign tax;
the first day the unfair foreign tax becomes effective.
Our US tax group are following this development closely and can advise on the potential application of the s.899 provisions
Multiple factors will be relevant, such as whether a client is located in a “discriminatory foreign country”, whether it derives income subject to the increased tax and whether any exemptions apply
Assessing the impact of these rules requires not only a US assessment, but also an assessment of whether relevant non-US jurisdictions have or intend to introduce “unfair foreign taxes”
As the legislation progresses through the US Senate and there is greater clarity on the final form of the provision, it may be possible to consider structuring options to mitigate any impact
In the meantime, those potentially affected should ensure that legal documentation allocating tax risk (such as gross-up provisions in finance agreements and IP licenses) is drafted to capture this new potential tax charge
Our US tax group are providing regular updates as the legislation progresses. Should you want more detailed advice on the potential application of this new US tax rule, please reach out to either your usual tax group contact, or the contacts at the end of this briefing.
Eversheds Sutherland prend toutes les précautions raisonnables et nécessaires pour s'assurer que les informations et les documents, y compris, mais sans s'y limiter, les articles, les bulletins d'information, les rapports, les enquêtes et les blogs ("matériel") sur le site Web d'Eversheds Sutherland sont exacts et complets. Toutefois, ces documents sont fournis à titre d'information générale uniquement, et non dans le but de fournir des conseils juridiques, et ne reflètent pas nécessairement la législation ou la réglementation en vigueur. Ces documents ne doivent pas être interprétés comme des conseils juridiques sur quelque sujet que ce soit.
Les documents peuvent ne pas refléter les développements juridiques les plus récents. Le contenu et l'interprétation des documents, ainsi que la législation qui y est abordée, peuvent faire l'objet de révisions.
Aucune déclaration ou garantie, expresse ou implicite, n'est faite quant à l'exactitude ou à l'exhaustivité de la documentation et il convient donc de ne pas s'y fier. Eversheds Sutherland décline toute responsabilité en ce qui concerne les mesures prises ou non prises sur la base de tout ou partie du contenu des documents, dans toute la mesure permise par la loi. Les documents n'ont pas vocation à être exhaustifs ou à inclure des conseils sur lesquels vous pouvez vous appuyer. Vous devez toujours consulter un juriste/avocat dûment qualifié pour toute question juridique spécifique.
Les opinions exprimées dans les documents sont celles de leur auteur et ne reflètent pas nécessairement celles d'Eversheds Sutherland ou de tout autre avocat.