Ch. 7 Ruling Is Warning For Merchant Cash Advance Providers
Court ruling recharacterizes MCA agreements as loans, exposing funders to multi-million-dollar preference liability.
July 18, 2025
Ch. 7 Ruling Is Warning For Merchant Cash Advance ProvidersCourt ruling recharacterizes MCA agreements as loans, exposing funders to multi-million-dollar preference liability.July 18, 2025 Law360 A recent bankruptcy court ruling in In re: JPR Mechanical Inc. delivers a major warning to MCA providers: labels won’t protect you if your agreement looks like a loan. The court ordered a provider to return over $3 million in payments after recharacterizing its contracts as disguised debt. This decision underscores the growing risk of preference exposure, especially when reconciliation terms are weak or procedural missteps occur. With courts increasingly focused on economic substance over form, MCA funders should take note. Read the full analysis to see what this means for your contracts, litigation strategy, and compliance risk. Latest Events
virtual Employment law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia September 29, 2026 9.30am - 12.30pm (BST) Virtual in-person Labor relations conference - turning legal change into workplace reality October 08, 2026 10.00am - 4.00pm (BST) London, United Kingdom virtual Energy Transition Series: Energy Transition and Pricing Volatility October 08, 2026 10:00 ET | 15:00 BST | 16:00 CET virtual Ireland & Northern Ireland employment law October 14, 2026 2pm - 5pm (GMT) Virtual |