The deadline for re-affirming CPO exemptions/exclusions is approaching


People capabilities Services Banking and Finance Competition, Trade and Foreign Investment Construction and Engineering Corporate and M&A Corporate Crime Data Privacy, Security and Technology Employment, Labor and Pensions Financial Services Regulation Heinonen Insurance Intellectual Property Litigation & Dispute Resolution Private Client Real Estate and Planning Strategic Contracts Tax Industries Consumer Consumer overview Hospitality and Leisure Luxury Energy Energy overview Hydrogen Financial Services Governments and Infrastructure Industrials Life Sciences and Healthcare Real Estate Technology & Digital Technology & Digital overview Digital Infrastructure Resources Insights Client tools Events and training Business topics About About us Firm leadership Purpose and values Responsible business Community Diversity and inclusion Environmental sustainability Pro bono Reports News Careers Global careers Applications Why us? Lawyers and partners Business professionals Students and recent graduates Offices Finland Visit global site Select a local version of the site Angola Asia Austria Belgium Bulgaria Czech Republic Estonia Finland France Germany Hungary Iraq Ireland Italy Jordan Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Mauritius Mozambique Netherlands Poland Portugal Qatar Romania Saudi Arabia Slovakia South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland Tunisia United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Rest of the world en Select language English The deadline for re-affirming CPO exemptions/exclusions is approaching Home Resources Insights Home Resources Insights The deadline for re-affirming CPO exemptions/exclusions is approaching The deadline for re-affirming CPO exemptions/exclusions is approaching February 13, 2025 United States United States United States Under Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regulations, persons who have claimed an exemption or exception from commodity pool operator (CPO) or commodity trading advisor (CTA) status pursuant to Part 4 of the CFTC’s regulations must affirm their continued eligibility for the exemption annually within 60 days of the calendar year. This year, the deadline falls on March 1, 2025. CFTC Regulation 4.5 Of the Part 4 regulations, CFTC regulation 4.5 is relevant to business development companies (BDCs). Per the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations, a collective investment vehicle that engages in commodity interest (i.e., futures, swaps or options) trading is a “commodity pool.” This definition technically captures BDCs. Persons who operate commodity pools (i.e., BDC managers) are CPOs under the CEA and CFTC regulations. CPOs are required to register with the CFTC via the National Futures Association (NFA) and registered CPOs are subject to myriad regulatory compliance obligations. Among other things, CFTC regulation 4.5 affords an exclusion from the CPO definition for managers of BDCs and registered investment companies (RICs). Pursuant to CFTC regulation 4.5, a manager of a BDC or RIC does not need to register as a CPO so long as: The manager does not market the BDC or RIC to the public as an investment in a commodity pool or otherwise as an investment vehicle for the trading of commodity interests; The manager represents that it limits the use of commodity interests in the BDC or RIC consistent with a de minimis trading threshold under CFTC Regulation 4.5(c)(2)(iii)(A)-(B);¹ and The manager claims the exception with the NFA. In addition, disclosure about the BDC or RIC manager’s reliance on the CFTC regulation 4.5 exclusion with respect to the BDC or RIC must be made to investors in writing. This disclosure typically appears in the prospectus, the annual report on Form 10-K, or the quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Claiming Relief with the NFA The NFA’s exemptions filing system is available at https://www.nfa.futures.org/electronic-filing-systems/exemptions.html. A BDC or RIC manager will need to create an account to use the exemptions filing system and must have certain information about the RIC or BDC available, including its tax identification number. If any assistance is required, please feel free to contact any of the attorneys listed or the Eversheds Sutherland attorney with whom you regularly work. __________ If you have any questions about this legal briefing, please feel free to contact any of the attorneys listed under 'Related People/Contributors' or the Eversheds Sutherland attorney with whom you regularly work. _{1 The de minimis threshold is an either/or test. It compares the notional amount of a BDC or RIC’s derivatives to the BDC or RIC’s NAV or the amount of margin/premium required for the BDC or RIC’s derivatives to the BDC or RIC’s NAV. The threshold must be satisfied each time a new derivative is entered into as well as when the CFTC regulation 4.5 exclusion is claimed and affirmed.} The materials on the Eversheds Sutherland website are for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. While reasonable care is taken to ensure accuracy, the materials may not reflect the most current legal developments. Eversheds Sutherland disclaims liability for actions taken based on the materials. Always consult a qualified lawyer for specific legal matters. To view the full disclaimer, see our Terms and Conditions or Disclaimer section in the footer. Eversheds Sutherland is a provider of legal and other services operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information about these entities and Eversheds Sutherlands' structure please see the Legal Notice page of this website. Services Financial Services Regulation Client Tools BDC Essentials Key contacts Steven B. Boehm Partner Washington, DC, United States Dwaune L. Dupree Partner Washington, DC, United States Stephani M. Hildebrandt Partner Washington, DC, United States Cynthia M. Krus Partner Washington, DC, United States Sara Sabour Nasseri Partner Washington, DC, United States Anne G. Oberndorf Partner Washington, DC, United States Owen J. Pinkerton Partner Washington, DC, United States Raymond A. Ramirez Partner Washington, DC, United States Payam Siadatpour Partner Washington, DC, United States Tuong-anh T. Pham Associate Washington, DC, United States Latest Insights legal updates Commercially Connected shorts - 23 September 2026 legal updates Commercially Connected shorts - 16 September 2026 legal updates CMA places public procurement at the centre of its growth agenda legal updates Creative Borrowing or Infringement of Rights? The Intersection of Pastiche and Parody Exceptions and Trademark Infringement Latest News client news We advised Biosafe on the acquisition of Regal’s consulting business client news We advised Frasers Group Plc on Acquisition of Three Retail Property Assets in Finland client news All change: Eversheds Sutherland advises DfT on Chiltern Railways transition client news We advised Santa's Holding Oy, Lappset Group Oy and the Länkinen family on a landmark Arctic tourism partnership Latest Events virtual \| September 29, 2026 Employment law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in-person \| October 08, 2026 Labor relations conference - turning legal change into workplace reality virtual \| October 08, 2026 Energy Transition Series: Energy Transition and Pricing Volatility virtual \| October 14, 2026 Ireland & Northern Ireland employment law Tabs Label legal updates September 23, 2026 Commercially Connected shorts - 23 September 2026 legal updates September 16, 2026 Commercially Connected shorts - 16 September 2026 legal updates September 15, 2026 CMA places public procurement at the centre of its growth agenda legal updates September 15, 2026 Creative Borrowing or Infringement of Rights? The Intersection of Pastiche ... Legal notices General Terms Privacy notice Cookies Distance Selling Whistleblowing LinkedIn YouTube Connect Contact us Client login Staff login Subscribe About us About Eversheds Sutherland Purpose and values Responsible business Alumni Insights Client tools Events and training Business topics Careers Offices © Eversheds Sutherland 2026. All rights reserved. Eversheds Sutherland is a provider of legal and other services operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information about these entities and Eversheds Sutherlands' structure please see the Legal Notice page of this website. Eversheds Sutherland is the name and brand under which the members of Eversheds Sutherland Limited (Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP and Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP) and their respective controlled, managed and affiliated firms and the members of Eversheds Sutherland (Europe) Limited (each an "Eversheds Sutherland Entity" and together the "Eversheds Sutherland Entities") provide legal or other services to clients around the world. Eversheds Sutherland Entities are constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local regulatory and legal requirements and operate in accordance with their locally registered names. The use of the name Eversheds Sutherland, is for description purposes only and does not imply that the Eversheds Sutherland Entities are in a partnership or are part of a global LLP. The responsibility for the provision of services to the client is defined in the terms of engagement between the instructed firm and the client. For further information about these Eversheds Sutherland Entities and Eversheds Sutherlands’ structure please see the Legal Notices page of this website.

Under Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regulations, persons who have claimed an exemption or exception from commodity pool operator (CPO) or commodity trading advisor (CTA) status pursuant to Part 4 of the CFTC’s regulations must affirm their continued eligibility for the exemption annually within 60 days of the calendar year. This year, the deadline falls on March 1, 2025.

CFTC Regulation 4.5

Of the Part 4 regulations, CFTC regulation 4.5 is relevant to business development companies (BDCs).

Per the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations, a collective investment vehicle that engages in commodity interest (i.e., futures, swaps or options) trading is a “commodity pool.” This definition technically captures BDCs. Persons who operate commodity pools (i.e., BDC managers) are CPOs under the CEA and CFTC regulations. CPOs are required to register with the CFTC via the National Futures Association (NFA) and registered CPOs are subject to myriad regulatory compliance obligations.

Among other things, CFTC regulation 4.5 affords an exclusion from the CPO definition for managers of BDCs and registered investment companies (RICs). Pursuant to CFTC regulation 4.5, a manager of a BDC or RIC does not need to register as a CPO so long as:

The manager does not market the BDC or RIC to the public as an investment in a commodity pool or otherwise as an investment vehicle for the trading of commodity interests;
The manager represents that it limits the use of commodity interests in the BDC or RIC consistent with a de minimis trading threshold under CFTC Regulation 4.5(c)(2)(iii)(A)-(B);¹ and
The manager claims the exception with the NFA.

In addition, disclosure about the BDC or RIC manager’s reliance on the CFTC regulation 4.5 exclusion with respect to the BDC or RIC must be made to investors in writing. This disclosure typically appears in the prospectus, the annual report on Form 10-K, or the quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Claiming Relief with the NFA

The NFA’s exemptions filing system is available at https://www.nfa.futures.org/electronic-filing-systems/exemptions.html. A BDC or RIC manager will need to create an account to use the exemptions filing system and must have certain information about the RIC or BDC available, including its tax identification number. If any assistance is required, please feel free to contact any of the attorneys listed or the Eversheds Sutherland attorney with whom you regularly work.

__________

If you have any questions about this legal briefing, please feel free to contact any of the attorneys listed under 'Related People/Contributors' or the Eversheds Sutherland attorney with whom you regularly work.

_{1 The de minimis threshold is an either/or test. It compares the notional amount of a BDC or RIC’s derivatives to the BDC or RIC’s NAV or the amount of margin/premium required for the BDC or RIC’s derivatives to the BDC or RIC’s NAV. The threshold must be satisfied each time a new derivative is entered into as well as when the CFTC regulation 4.5 exclusion is claimed and affirmed.}

The materials on the Eversheds Sutherland website are for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. While reasonable care is taken to ensure accuracy, the materials may not reflect the most current legal developments. Eversheds Sutherland disclaims liability for actions taken based on the materials. Always consult a qualified lawyer for specific legal matters. To view the full disclaimer, see our Terms and Conditions or Disclaimer section in the footer. Eversheds Sutherland is a provider of legal and other services operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information about these entities and Eversheds Sutherlands' structure please see the Legal Notice page of this website.